978-744-TAPS (8277) info@aperformingartsacademy.com
Select Page

The ACCC may require companies to substantiate all claims on their social media pages and may take legal action if it finds a violation of the law (or issues a notice of violation in certain circumstances). You can contact the online social network. Most allow you to request that your personal information be deleted for privacy reasons. As Andrew Bushnell of the Melbourne-based Institute of Public Affairs put it, “this is a blatant attack on media freedom to report on matters of public interest and goes far beyond what would be necessary to achieve the stated goal.” It is not clear whether all these provisions will be included in the final invoice. However, the project represents the Australian government`s intention to strengthen regulation for online and social media organisations. If you are not satisfied with the response of an online social network or other organization, you can file a complaint with us In summary, the electronic security officer has significant new powers under the law that affect social media. The Commissioner`s expanded regulatory role includes: The Privacy Act, 1988 (Privacy Act) includes organizations with annual revenues of more than $3 million operating in Australia, as well as a number of other organizations. If the online social network you use is such an organization, the personal data you share on it is protected by data protection law. These organizations include Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, and LinkedIn. It should also be noted that the Data Protection Act does not apply to persons acting in their personal capacity. This means that, in general, you cannot assert a data protection right against an individual. However, you may have rights under other laws, such as copyright laws or defamation.

Monitor your social media pages and remove any posts that might be false, misleading, or misleading once you become aware of them. This is what accc would expect you to do with any other type of advertising. New laws allow Australia`s electronic security commissioner to force platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to remove “cyber-abuse material” within 24 hours or face a hefty fine. This is a second outcome for those who are not satisfied with the platforms` moderation policies. Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison (who himself has posted more than 7,000 times on Twitter) said that “large social media companies have a responsibility to take all possible measures to ensure that their technological products are not exploited by murderous terrorists. It shouldn`t just be about doing the right thing. That should be the law. Without explaining in detail what a breach entails and providing reasonable conditions that tech companies can actually meet, it is not just about media freedom or Australia`s competitiveness, but about freedom of expression in the broad sense, as it extends to anyone who posts content online.

If the information you post on the online social network you use is publicly available, anyone can view it. If you want to restrict who can see your information, use the privacy settings. Do not make statements on your Facebook or other social media pages that you would not make in any other type of advertising. If you`re not sure what you can and can`t say, seek legal advice. “If websites or apps systematically ignore eSafety`s takedown notices for this type of content, under these new laws, they could have their websites disassociated by search engines or their apps removed from app stores,” Australian Minister Paul Fletcher`s office said in a press release last December. If someone has posted information about you on an online social network that you want to delete, ask them to delete it. If they refuse, there are other steps you can take. Australian adults can now turn to the government if they are bullied on social media. You may also be held responsible for posts or public comments made by others on your social media pages that are false or that could mislead or deceive consumers.

In 2011, a court case found that a company took responsibility for fan posts and testimonials on its social media pages when it became aware of them and decided not to remove them. This topic is not limited to the removal of unpleasant content from the Internet. This is a very slippery slope towards media censorship, and by giving the eSafety Commission the power to inform tech companies about offensive material, they end up with a digital muzzle to use it as they see fit, in line with their own political biases and ideologies. Victims of defamation can also apply for an end-user disclosure order in the Federal Court of Australia, which would legally require digital media companies to provide the victim with the troll`s details, inform the troll that someone has filed a complaint against them, and ask them to remove the defamatory content, cash said.